Bryan and I have had Roth IRAs (for retirement) since we got married in 1999. We also have retirement accounts through our employers. I’ve done some reading about investments and retiring (one of my favorite resources is the Motley Fool), but in general, our investments (which we have with Charles Schwab) aren’t something we think about very much.
Earlier this year, we purchased a new life insurance policy for Bryan. The man who sold us the life insurance is a financial planner, and Bryan and I met with him this morning to get his assessment of our retirement savings.
Matt Cuplin with Midwest Financial Group is a nice guy. He was thorough and good at answering questions. (See here for info on working with a financial manager!) His main advice was that Bryan and I switch gears from the traditional “buy and hold” theory of investing and move to a system where we more actively manage our investments.
Currently, we have our funds in a couple aggressive mutual funds (Schwab MarketTrack All Equity is the main one). They’ve been there for 10 years. There’s been growth, there’s been decline. Frankly, I don’t even read the statements more than once a year because our approach has been that over time, (and we’ve got a lot of time until retirement) the accounts will go up. So why sweat it on the short term? The fees are low, and history has showed that stocks are a good bet in the long-term.
The downside of working with money managers is that you have to pay them. And in general, I’m not so in to paying fees on my investments. Matt’s argument is that actively managed funds do better in a “flat market.” The money managers pull back on stocks (re-allocate) during flat periods and then re-invest in stocks when things pick up. Overall, this approach is supposed to lead to higher returns.
Matt is recommending that we move our funds to a company called Flexible Plan Investments. His information shows that their aggressive fund out-performs the Index in a 10-year period. Its benchmark return (after fees) is a couple points higher than what we’ve been getting on either of our funds.
Matt’s argument is that by actively managing our investments, we’ll earn enough more that we’ll cover the 2% fee plus (which covers himself and the we’ll have more in the bank.
Sooo, I think we’re going to try it. We’ve done the other approach for 10 years, we’ll give this approach a spin for a while.
That said, if anyone out there has sage advice about investing or spots any red flags in this scenario, please let me know!